Indigenous groups oppose the Revell DGR, citing jurisdictional disrespect, ignored traditional laws, and inadequate environmental impact assessments.
NWMO
Indigenous Nations and transboundary groups oppose the Revell DGR, citing ignored legal claims and transportation safety risks.
Excluding nuclear waste transportation from the Revell site assessment ignores critical safety risks along the Trans-Canada Highway...
Federal assessment must address transboundary Indigenous rights, unresolved land claims, and traditional harvesting risks across the transportation...
Proponents emphasize economic revitalization, climate leadership, and technical safety while dismissing opposition concerns as largely based on...
This report identifies critical regulatory gaps and jurisdictional conflicts regarding the proposed Revell Site Deep Geological Repository.
The NWMO is attempting to exclude transportation and socio-economic impacts from the Revell DGR Impact Assessment process.
Rigorous public participation is essential to address systemic engagement deficiencies and unmitigated risks in the Revell repository...
Indigenous opposition cites Section 35 violations, exclusion of transportation risks, and failure to respect Anishinaabe law.
Art Borups Corners used AI to analyze nearly 1,000 nuclear impact submissions—fast, precise and empowering.