Mandate Board
Showing all generated tasks sorted by priority.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% self-sufficiency for all emergency response categories (Fire, Medical, and Security) within the Project site and its immediate transportation corridors, rather than relying on regional hubs.
Request a comprehensive land-use and access map detailing all proposed security and safety exclusion zones and their direct intersection with existing recreational trails, hunting grounds, and ATV/snowmobile routes used by Melgund residents.
Commission an independent socio-economic study on the Stigma Effect of the DGR on property values and tourism-dependent businesses within a 15km radius of the Revell Site, specifically targeting the unorganized township of Melgund.
Request a plain-language technical bridge that translates the cited CNSC REGDOCs and CSA standards (N288.4, N288.5, N288.7) into specific, measurable water and air quality thresholds for the Revell site.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% self-sufficiency in emergency response for environmental spills or industrial accidents, including on-site fire and medical capacity.
Demand a detailed definition of 'adaptive management' that includes specific, pre-defined 'stop-work' triggers for groundwater protection.
Request technical specifications for the proposed heating plant, including fuel source and emission control technologies, alongside a localized air quality dispersion model for the Revell site.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% self-sufficiency in emergency response and fire suppression for industrial risks identified in the filing, specifically blasting and heavy mobile fleet operations.
Request a comprehensive traffic safety and infrastructure impact study for the Highway 17 corridor, specifically addressing the frequency and weight of 'mobile fleets' and 'used nuclear fuel transport'.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% on-site self-sufficiency for industrial fire, medical, and hazmat response related to the 'welding,' 'copper coating,' and 'temporary dry storage' operations described.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% self-sufficiency in emergency response capacity, including fire suppression, advanced life support, and site security, without reliance on regional municipal services.
Demand a comprehensive mapping of all proposed land closures and 'safety zones' that identifies specific intersections with existing recreational trail networks and hunting areas used by Melgund residents.
Request a comprehensive traffic inventory that quantifies the logistics for 'sealing materials and buffer boxes manufactured on site,' distinct from the cited 'five certified transportation packages each day.'
Request a comprehensive inventory and mapping of current recreational and subsistence land use—including hunting, fishing, and established snowmobile/ATV trail networks—on the provincial Crown lands identified in the Proponent's submission for transfer to private ownership.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% self-sufficiency for all emergency response requirements (fire, medical, and security) and assess the impact of project-related incidents on regional response times for Melgund residents.
Request specific operational constraints and maximum capacity limits for the 'temporary dry storage' area to ensure it does not function as a long-term surface facility.
Request the Proponent provide site-specific baseline monitoring data for ambient noise and light levels specifically within the residential clusters of Melgund Township (Dyment and Borups Corners) to validate the 'negligible risk' characterization.
Demand a comprehensive assessment of potential negative economic impacts, specifically focusing on property devaluation and cost-of-living increases for residents in the unorganized territory of Melgund.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% on-site self-sufficiency for the 'Emergency response building(s)', 'Explosives magazine', and 'Diesel and propane tanks' listed in Table 10.1.
Formally contest the exclusion of transportation activities on existing highways from the Project's scope, as stated in Section 10.3, and demand the inclusion of Highway 17 accident scenarios as a Valued Component.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% self-sufficiency for emergency response (fire, medical, and security) at the Revell site and along transportation corridors, rather than relying on regional hubs.
Request a detailed inventory of radiological and industrial waste streams and their specific discharge points into the local watershed near the Revell site, as referenced in Sections 24 and 25 of the Proponent's submission.
Request detailed effluent criteria, discharge locations, and failure modeling for the 'Domestic sewage treatment plant', 'Process water settling pond', and 'Discharge pipeline' listed in Table 10.1.
Formally include 'Local Recreational Land Use' and 'Social Cohesion (Dyment Recreation Hall)' as Valued Components (VCs) in the Impact Statement guidelines to address the gaps in Section 22 of the Proponent's submission.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% self-sufficiency in emergency response (Fire, Medical, Spill Response) for the Revell site and transport corridors within Melgund Township, as the management plans in Section 25 currently lack local context.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% self-sufficiency for emergency response and nuclear emergency preparedness as referenced in REGDOC-2.10.1 and the Explosives Act.
Request comprehensive hydrogeological baseline studies for the Melgund and Dyment area to address the potential impacts of water takings exceeding 50,000 L/d and large-scale sewage works.
Demand a specific Transportation Safety and Emergency Response Plan for the movement of used nuclear fuel and explosives through the Melgund corridor, as governed by the Transportation of Dangerous Goods Act.
Challenge the Proponent's assertion that 'no other applicable strategic assessments are required' by formally requesting the inclusion of a 'Community Well-being and Social Carrying Capacity' assessment as a specific Valued Component.
Challenge the Proponent's reliance on a 'conceptual post-closure safety analysis' within the integrated assessment; demand specific, non-conceptual modelling of long-term groundwater and soil stability prior to IAA approval.
Request the formal inclusion of 'Site Characterization' activities (drilling, traffic, workforce presence) into the Socio-Economic Baseline and Impact Statement, despite the Proponent's claim that it is 'not a designated activity' under the IAA.
Challenge the Proponent's statement that 'no regional studies' exist by mandating the creation of a specific Regional Cumulative Effects Assessment for the Wabigoon-Ignace-Melgund corridor.
Request the immediate commissioning of a 'Local-Regional Land Use and Recreation Study' to fill the admitted gap in regional assessments for the Melgund, Dyment, and Borups Corners area.
Challenge the Proponent's engagement classification of Melgund LSB as an 'Inform' stakeholder (Section 5.4) regarding Emergency Preparedness, specifically in light of the commitment to 'support emergency services' in Ignace (Section 5.1).
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% self-sufficiency for emergency medical, fire, and spill response for the Revell site and the transportation corridor through Borups Corners and Dyment, including a detailed assessment of response times from regional hubs.
Request a comprehensive land-use and access study for the provincial Crown lands within the Revell site and surrounding Melgund Township, specifically mapping hunting grounds, trapping lines, and recreational trail networks used by the local community.
Require the Proponent to establish a legally binding 'Melgund Infrastructure and Mitigation Fund' to address the long-term costs of road maintenance, infrastructure upgrades, and community service pressures resulting from the project.
Request a specific breakdown of the 'long-term employment, training and business opportunities' specifically for Melgund Township residents, distinguishing them from the broader 'Northwestern Ontario' region.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% self-sufficiency for emergency response (fire, medical, and security) at the Revell site and provide a dedicated emergency response sub-station in Melgund.
Request a localized hydrogeological baseline and monitoring program specifically for private residential wells within a 10km radius of the Revell site, including pre-construction chemical and radiological characterization.
Require a 'Health Service Capacity Mitigation Plan' that funds the expansion of the Mary Berglund Community Health Centre and regional hubs prior to the start of the construction phase.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate how they will fulfill the stated benefit of 'protecting people' during 'site preparation' given Melgund's total lack of local emergency services.
Demand the immediate installation of a permanent, real-time air quality monitoring station within Melgund Township (Dyment/Borups Corners) to replace the reliance on distant regional data.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% self-sufficiency in emergency response capacity, including fire, medical, and spill response, for all project-related activities and transport.
Require a rigorous chemical 'fingerprinting' of existing surface water and soil contaminants to distinguish between natural geological exceedances and future project-related impacts.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% self-sufficiency for emergency response (fire, medical, and hazardous material spills) at the Revell Site and along the immediate Highway 17 corridor serving Borups Corners and Dyment.
Demand the inclusion of 'Local Commuter Safety and Highway 17 Integrity' as a specific Valued Component (VC) in the Impact Statement, focusing on the 15km radius around the project centroid.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% self-sufficiency for emergency response (Fire, Medical, and Security) for the proposed 'accommodation camps' and 'access road' options listed in Table 13.1.
Request a detailed hydrogeological impact assessment for each 'Alternative Mean' regarding water supply (surface vs. groundwater) and discharge locations identified in Table 13.1.
Request a detailed infrastructure assessment outlining the specific transmission line corridors and substation locations required to connect the Revell site to the Ontario electricity grid.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate full self-sufficiency in emergency response capabilities (fire, ambulance, spill response) specifically for the 13-year "Site Preparation and Construction" phase (2030–2042) outlined in Table 12.1.
Assess the proposed location of the 'worker accommodation camp' described as being 'within or near the town of Ignace' (Section 5.3.2) to determine potential spillover impacts on Melgund.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% self-sufficiency regarding the "fire protection systems" and emergency response for the proposed "worker accommodation camps" mentioned in Section 4.2.2.
Request detailed mitigation strategies for the "management of excavated rock" referenced in Section 4.2.2, specifically regarding dust generation and surface water runoff.
Assess the social and safety impacts of the "worker accommodation camps" (Section 4.2.2) specifically on the residents of Dyment and Borups Corners.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% emergency response self-sufficiency (fire, ambulance, security) at the Revell Site, noting the text's reference to 'infrastructure development' support for Ignace but exclusion of the unorganized territory.
Request a specific socio-economic baseline study for Melgund Township to counter-balance the 'economic growth' and 'social and cultural enrichment' analysis explicitly referenced for the Township of Ignace.
Challenge the Proponent's definition of the ALARA principle, specifically the text's assertion that mitigation will take 'social and economic factors into account' regarding releases to air, water, and soils.
Require a 'Self-Sufficiency Capacity Assessment' regarding the text's mention of 'access restrictions for safety and security' and potential 'releases,' specifically proving the Proponent can manage these events without relying on local services.
Request detailed mapping of the 'direct overprinting of land' and 'access restrictions' mentioned in the text to identify specific conflicts with local recreational trails and harvesting areas.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% self-sufficiency for emergency medical, fire, and security response at the Revell Site and the proposed worker accommodation camp.
Request site-specific noise, vibration, and air quality modeling data specifically for the residential receptors located in Borups Corners and Dyment.
Mandate a dedicated socio-economic impact assessment for Melgund Township that is distinct from the Ignace Area Community Well-Being Studies.
Require a detailed groundwater protection and monitoring plan that specifically addresses the risk to private residential wells in the Melgund area.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% self-sufficiency in emergency response capacity for the Revell site, including fire suppression, emergency medical services, and hazardous material spill response.
Request a technical justification for the application of the ALARA principle where 'economic' and 'practical' considerations might be used to justify radioactive or hazardous releases into the local watershed.
Demand the Proponent demonstrate 100% self-sufficiency for emergency response and fire suppression capabilities for the proposed on-site LLW and ILW storage facilities.
Require a socio-economic study on the impact of long-term 'interim' storage of LLW and ILW on local property values and the 'nuclear dump' stigma in Melgund.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% self-sufficiency for fire, medical, and security services for the proposed worker accommodation camp and site preparation activities.
Request the inclusion of private residential wells in Dyment and Borups Corners within the hydrogeological baseline monitoring program for site preparation and water management facilities.
Request a gap analysis identifying where the Proponent intends to deviate from the full requirements of REGDOC-1.2.3, given the use of the term 'general accordance'.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% emergency service self-sufficiency for the worker accommodation camp and repository site, including fire, medical, and security response.
Request a detailed management and mitigation plan for the excavated rock management area, specifically addressing dust suppression, leachate toxicity, and long-term visual impacts.
Demand the inclusion of local transportation safety—specifically school bus routes and residential access points in Borups Corners—within the project's Valued Components (VCs).
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% self-sufficiency for emergency response—including fire, medical, and hazardous material spills—at the Revell site and along the immediate transport corridor, rather than relying on regional hubs.
Request the formal inclusion of 'Unorganized Territory Socio-Economic Stability' as a Valued Component (VC) to specifically measure impacts on property values and community cohesion in Melgund.
Demand the Proponent demonstrate 100% self-sufficiency for all emergency response categories (Fire, Medical, and Hazardous Materials) for the Revell site and its immediate transit corridors.
Formally designate 'Highway 17 Traffic Safety and Emergency Access' as a Valued Component (VC) for the socio-economic assessment.
Request the release of site-specific hydrogeological and crystalline rock integrity data for the Revell site to validate the 'secure containment' hypothesis.
Request the Proponent to formally redefine the 'Project Area' to explicitly include Melgund Township (Dyment and Borups Corners) as a primary impacted community in all socio-economic and safety baseline studies.
Demand the Proponent provide a comprehensive Emergency Response Plan demonstrating 100% self-sufficiency for fire, medical, and security services at the Revell Site and the immediate Highway 17 corridor.
Request the inclusion of 'Transportation Safety for Unorganized Residents' as a specific Valued Component (VC) in the Impact Statement, with a focus on the Highway 17 corridor between Dyment and Borups Corners.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% self-sufficiency for emergency medical, fire, and security services for the Project and its associated workforce, specifically addressing the safety risks identified in the filing's reference to MMIWG Call for Justice 13.
Request the Proponent conduct a comprehensive socio-economic and demographic baseline study specifically for the unincorporated communities of Melgund, Dyment, and Borups Corners to rectify the admitted data deficiencies in the Initial Project Description.
Require the Proponent to develop a specific 'Neighbor Impact Mitigation Plan' for Melgund that addresses the 'perceived risks' and social stigma mentioned in the filing, including a Property Value Protection Program.
Request a comparative hydrogeological analysis for the 'Source of water supply' and 'Water Discharge' options listed in Table 12.5 (Items 4 and 5), specifically evaluating risks to private wells in Dyment and Borups Corners.
Mandate a baseline noise, vibration, and light pollution study specifically at the coordinates of the nearest residents in Borups Corners and Dyment.
Request a detailed validation of the 'quantitative understanding' of the site's geology, specifically challenging the assertion that remaining uncertainties do not affect 'fundamental suitability.'
Reject the Proponent's reliance on meteorological data from the Dryden station (55 km away) and mandate the immediate installation of on-site meteorological monitoring stations to capture local micro-climate data.
Request a corrective action plan for the admitted underestimation of winter precipitation (snow water equivalent) and a retrospective correction of the 2022-2023 water balance data.
Challenge the statistical sufficiency of using only six deep boreholes to characterize the entire 40km x 15km Revell batholith as 'homogeneous' and request a justification for this sampling density.
Request immediate validation and direct mapping of the 'larger-scale structures presently inferred to be fracture zones (FZs)' referenced in the Deep Geology section, moving beyond 'inference' to physical characterization.
Challenge the sufficiency of the Proponent's moose population baseline, specifically the 'low calf:cow ratio' where the cause is currently undetermined, and require a specific investigation into whether current predation or habitat factors are driving this decline before Project stressors are added.
Request immediate, traditional field verification (netting/electrofishing) for the American Eel, following the positive eDNA metabarcoding detection which the Proponent currently characterizes as 'uncertain' and 'outside the typical range'.
Formally object to the Proponent's statement that studies are 'sufficiently advanced to support a risk-informed assessment' while simultaneously admitting that 'further field studies are needed to verify the presence and distribution of SAR'.
Challenge the Proponent's methodology regarding the 'opportunistic identification of candidate Significant Wildlife Habitat (SWH)' alongside terrestrial ecosystem mapping, requesting a transition to systematic, dedicated SWH surveys.
Demand a management plan for Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials (NORM) in excavated bedrock, specifically addressing leaching risks into the local unorganized territory's groundwater.
Challenge the sufficiency of the 'temporary weather station' data (limited to 2021-present) and request a comparative analysis against at least 10 years of historical regional data to validate the 'reasonable range' assertion.
Challenge the Proponent's assertion that 'neither mercury nor polychlorinated biphenyls are expected to be released' by requiring a specific assessment of contaminant mobilization via physical sediment disturbance and hydrological changes.
Request a comprehensive hydrogeological baseline study specifically for private wells in Melgund, distinct from the municipal systems described for Ignace and Dryden.
Establish a comprehensive hydrogeological baseline for private wells and septic efficacy in Melgund, citing the Proponent's submission that water services are the 'responsibility of the homeowner' and rely on 'cisterns and water wells'.
Establish a comprehensive baseline for surface water quality and aquatic health specifically for Melgund Lake.
Request confirmation that provincial standards for 'Industrial Sewage Works' and 'Water Taking' (Table 18.3) will be adopted as the minimum performance benchmarks, despite the jurisdictional 'uncertainty' noted in Section 18.4.
Challenge the designation of 'Not applicable' for Assessment Endpoints regarding Air Quality, Noise/Vibration, Hydrogeology, and Surface Water Quality in Table 19.1.
Challenge the Proponent's reliance on generic industry data (MECP 2017) which assumes emissions settle within 500m to 1km, and demand the immediate completion and peer review of site-specific air quality dispersion modelling.
Reject the 'Negligible Risk' and 'High Confidence' ratings for Noise, Vibration, and Light until the Proponent completes and submits the site-specific modelling admitted to be missing in Section 19.2.3.3.2.
Request the immediate completion and peer review of the 'Conceptual Groundwater Model' to substantiate the claim that drawdown effects will be limited to 'a few hundred metres'.
Request specific spatial mapping and concentration gradients for the proposed 'regulated mixing zone' where effluent dilution is expected to occur.
Require the immediate completion and peer review of the 'integrated site-wide water balance and water quality modelling' prior to the acceptance of any risk designations.
Require immediate clarification and correction of Table 19.11, which is referenced as the risk screening for 'Topography, Soils and Sediment' but is titled 'Surface Water Quality'.
Request the specific quantitative baseline data and statistical definition of 'natural variability' for soil and sediment chemistry in the Melgund area.
Challenge the sufficiency of the 'non-acid generating' rock classification by requesting comprehensive leachate testing for neutral-pH metal leaching and blasting residues (nitrates/ammonia).
Request specific technical justification for the 'active measures' cited in the Institutional Control definition, specifically the reference to 'water treatment' post-2193.
Request site-specific hydrogeological data to validate the claim in Tables 12.1 and 12.4 that the host rock exhibits 'low groundwater flow,' distinguishing local Revell site conditions from general Canadian Shield averages.
Request the specific baseline metrics and indicators that will be used to define and monitor 'environmental integrity' regarding groundwater and geologic media during the proposed 'extended period' of testing.
Request the specific geophysical datasets and borehole logs used to map the 'inferred' Fracture Zones (FZs) and demand a quantitative definition of rock 'homogeneity' relative to these structural features.
Request immediate characterization of 'gently inclined and water-conducting features' in the Revell batholith prior to the Impact Statement, rather than deferring this to future licensing phases.
Require a definitive methodology and specific 'stop-work' criteria for the investigation of 'potential recent fault activity' and post-glacial faulting.
Require the submission of completed kinetic testing and leachate analysis results prior to the Impact Statement, rather than accepting the 'anticipated' non-acid generating outcomes cited in the text.
Request a statistical justification for the sufficiency of six boreholes to characterize the geochemical homogeneity of the entire repository volume, specifically regarding the 5% subordinate rock types (amphibolite and dykes).
Require the Proponent to re-sample sediments and utilize laboratory methods with detection limits strictly lower than federal/provincial quality guidelines, specifically for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and semi-volatile organic compounds.
Challenge the applicability of using air quality data from Thunder Bay and Winnipeg (240-350 km away) and request detailed validation against the new local 2023 dataset.
Challenge the sufficiency of the hydrogeological baseline, specifically the reliance on only five deep groundwater samples to characterize the entire repository block.
Request the specific geological and spatial rationale for the location of the three shallow well 'nests' and six deep boreholes to validate their representativeness for the 2024-2025 groundwater model.
Challenge the sufficiency of using 'gross alpha and gross beta' as the primary radiological indicators and formally request the inclusion of specific isotopes (e.g., Iodine-129, Cesium-137) in the baseline water quality program.
Require immediate physical field verification (netting/trapping) of the American eel (Anguilla rostrata) to confirm the eDNA detection mentioned in Section 14.7.1.
Challenge the Proponent's conclusion that 'no potentially important fish habitat' exists within the Project site, specifically requesting winter field surveys to validate the claim of 'no overwintering habitat' in local watercourses.
Challenge the Proponent's assertion that 2021-2022 baseline results based on 'desktop... mapping' and 'eDNA sampling' are 'sufficiently comprehensive,' specifically citing the admission in the text that eDNA interpretation is 'difficult due to limited data.'
Request specific baseline data and discharge modeling for 'treated effluent release' and 'water collection ponds' relative to Melgund's water sources.
Request the quantitative hydrogeological baseline data that underpins the 'Water Statement' and the 'integrative narrative' regarding the 'interconnected systems of water' described in the filing.
Request the inclusion of private residential wells in Dyment and Borups Corners as specific monitoring locations within the water quality baseline program.
Formalize a comprehensive well-water sampling program for all residents in the vicinity to establish pre-project baselines for uranium and naturally occurring radionuclides.
Require immediate, independent baseline thermal and ecological profiling for Mennin Lake, Lowery Lake, Church Lake, and Long Lake to address stated concerns regarding 'lake temperatures' and 'aquatic ecosystems.'
Request the Proponent redefine the 'Involve' criteria to include Melgund in 'environmental considerations' planning, rather than limiting this scope solely to the Township of Ignace.
Request the Proponent define the specific geographic radius used to determine 'proximity' and mandate the creation of a project-specific Regional Environmental Baseline to fill the identified data gap.
Request a quantitative definition of the "small amount" of on-site energy production and specific identification of the fuel sources and technologies intended for standby power generation.
Request the specific geological baseline data and hydrogeological modeling used to substantiate the claim that the selected site is a 'stable geological formation' capable of isolating 5.9 million bundles.
Request a detailed 'Site Characterization Environmental Management Plan' that quantifies the physical footprint (drilling, land clearing, water withdrawal) of activities the Proponent claims are exempt from IAA Section 7 prohibitions.
Request a detailed water balance model and specific discharge locations for the 'water management systems' referenced in Section 9.1.
Request immediate identification of specific geographic coordinates for the 'receiving locations' of treated water discharge, rather than the current vague '2 to 10 km radius' description.
Request precise coordinates and baseline ecological data for the 'receiving locations for treated water discharge' which are currently vaguely defined as being within a '2 to 10 km radius' of the site.
Request a specific management and segregation plan for the ~3% of excavated rock that is not biotite granodiorite-tonalite, specifically addressing the 'trace proportions of sulphur-bearing minerals' identified in the text.
Request immediate identification of the 'suitable receiving waterbody' mentioned for contact water discharge and provision of baseline water quality data for that specific body.
Request a specific baseline protocol for the 'surveys of soils and sediments' and 'ground water quality' monitoring mentioned, explicitly defining the Contaminants of Potential Concern (COPCs) related to decommissioning activities (e.g., concrete additives, demolition dust).
Challenge the characterization of residual effects on wetlands as 'negligible' and demand a site-specific 'No Net Loss' plan for the 17% of the site identified as swamp and fen.
Request a quantitative inventory of habitat loss, specified in hectares, for each of the 64 upland breeding bird species and eight SAR species identified in the Proponent's submission.
Challenge the Proponent's claim that residual effects on terrestrial wildlife will be 'negligible' despite a 'moderate likelihood' of sensory disturbance, and request the specific quantitative thresholds used to define 'ALARA' for noise and light emissions affecting the five endangered bat species and moose.
Request the Proponent provide localized, site-specific modeling for air quality, noise, and vibration impacts that accounts for the near-zero baseline of the Melgund unorganized territory.
Require the completion and disclosure of quantitative groundwater and surface water modeling for the Melgund watershed before finalizing the scope of the Impact Statement.
Challenge the Proponent's reliance on linear distance (140 km to the US border and 210 km to the Manitoba border) as a primary metric for environmental safety and demand a pathway-based impact assessment.
Validate that baseline data for groundwater, surface water, and terrestrial wildlife includes the specific watersheds and migration corridors used by harvesters in the Melgund area.
Request a detailed feasibility study and comparative analysis of low-carbon heating alternatives (such as industrial heat pumps or geothermal systems) to replace the proposed propane and natural gas heating plants.
Demand a detailed technical specification of the 'best available technology' for groundwater and effluent monitoring, specifically addressing how these systems will protect private well-water users in the unorganized territory of Melgund.
Demand a detailed Land Use and Access Management Plan that specifies the geographic extent of exclusion zones and the duration of restricted access to Crown lands in the Melgund area.
Challenge the Proponent to provide a site-specific Forest Fire Mitigation and Response Plan that demonstrates zero reliance on local municipal fire services.
Demand a detailed geochemical analysis of excavated rock and a comprehensive baseline study of the local watershed, specifically focusing on Lake Malagon and the potential for acid rock leachate.
Request the detailed list of parameters for 'Baseline Data Collection' (Section 2 of the Proponent's submission) to ensure local groundwater and soil conditions in the Melgund area are specifically monitored.
Request the Proponent provide an objective geochemical characterization protocol for excavated rock that removes the pre-determined language of 'confirming' non-toxicity as stated in Section 14.3 of the Initial Project Description.
Demand the establishment of a comprehensive groundwater and surface water baseline that includes private well testing in the Melgund area.
Request a comprehensive lifecycle greenhouse gas (GHG) assessment that includes Scope 3 emissions, specifically focusing on the transportation of nuclear waste and the carbon footprint of construction materials.
Demand a detailed technical evaluation of low-carbon alternatives for the proposed heating plant, such as geothermal or industrial-scale electric heat pumps, to replace high-emission fuel sources.
Challenge the Proponent's use of 'illustrative economic regions' in their socio-economic assessment and request a gap analysis comparing these generic models against the specific unorganized status of Melgund Township.
In response to the Proponent's request for 'specific elements... built into an implementation plan,' formally mandate that '100% Proponent-supplied Emergency Services' be listed as a critical project requirement.
Require an analysis of 'Access road alignments' (Table 12.5, Item 1) that specifically models impacts on emergency response times from regional hubs (Ignace/Dryden) to Melgund.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% self-sufficiency for emergency services regarding the 'Accommodation camps' (Table 12.5, Item 10), explicitly ruling out reliance on local capacity.
Require the disaggregation of socio-economic baseline data to specifically isolate Borups Corners and Dyment as distinct receptors, separate from the Township of Ignace.
Challenge the Proponent's citation of 'transportation safety' as a selection factor by demanding a gap analysis of emergency response times to the proposed Primary and Secondary Access Roads.
Require a specific assessment of how the 'extreme temperatures' (-43°C) and '175 cm of snowfall' cited in the text impact emergency response times from distant hubs (Ignace/Dryden) to the Project site and Melgund Township.
Require the Proponent to provide a detailed evidence-based justification for the claim that there is 'no potential link' between the Project and tick distribution/abundance, specifically analyzing the impact of creating edge habitats on deer (host) density and human interaction.
Require a specific vulnerability assessment detailing how projected increases in 'winter and spring precipitation' and 'ice dynamics' will impact emergency response travel times from Ignace and Dryden.
Request that the 'Infrastructure and services' baseline explicitly quantifies the 'zero-service' reality of Melgund (no fire, police, or ambulance) rather than aggregating service levels with regional hubs like Dryden or Ignace.
Reject the use of 'approximate community centroids' for Dyment and Borups Corners and require a detailed map of all permanent and seasonal residences to determine actual proximity to the Project site.
Challenge the Proponent's admission that the social baseline 'focuses primarily on the municipal context' and request a dedicated socio-economic profile for the unorganized LSB of Melgund that explicitly documents the lack of municipal services and governance.
Demand the immediate collection of baseline data on gender-based violence, rejecting the Proponent's statement that this data is 'currently not available' and can be deferred.
Request a specific assessment of emergency response capacity for 'external causes (injury)', given the Proponent's admission that injury is a leading cause of Potential Years of Life Lost (PYLL) and that existing services are already 'strained'.
Challenge the Proponent's conclusion that 'No further work planned for health outcomes baseline conditions characterization' is acceptable, specifically citing the alarming statistic that the average age of death in Ignace is 63.6 years.
Request a specific mitigation strategy regarding the Mary Berglund Community Health Centre Hub (MBCHCH), citing the text's admission that the facility is 'operating near capacity and does not have space to dedicate to additional service provision.'
Challenge the adequacy of the Ambulance Services baseline (Section 15.3.1) which identifies only two ambulances in Ignace and four in Dryden, failing to analyze response times to unorganized territories.
Request immediate, site-specific baseline testing of private residential wells in Dyment and Borups Corners for Uranium and heavy metals, independent of regional averages.
The text notes that the LSB of Wabigoon experiences a '50 to 60 percent' population increase during summer months. Request that the Proponent mandate that all emergency response planning and capacity assessments be based on this 'Peak Seasonal' population figure rather than the Census baseline.
The Proponent's submission provides specific demographic data for the 'Local Service Board of Wabigoon' but omits specific baseline data for the Local Services Board of Melgund. Request the immediate inclusion of Melgund's demographic profile, including specific counts for seasonal vs. permanent residents.
The Proponent's submission identifies high food costs and growing food insecurity as a baseline condition in Ignace and Dryden. The Working Group requests a specific assessment of 'Project-Induced Inflation' on the cost of the food basket during the construction phase.
The Proponent's submission characterizes the Local Services Board of Melgund as having 'limited resources/services' and relying on volunteers. The Working Group requires the Proponent to explicitly define this baseline to reflect the absolute absence of professional emergency services (Fire, Ambulance, Police) in Dyment and Borups Corners.
Challenge the Proponent's assertion that the infrastructure baseline is 'sufficiently complete' by demanding a specific 'Emergency Response Gap Analysis' for Melgund.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% emergency response self-sufficiency, noting that the filing identifies only 'volunteer fire departments' in neighboring Oxdrift and Wabigoon, confirming a lack of professional capacity in Melgund.
Evaluate the impact of the project on the 'limited resources/services' identified in the submission, specifically regarding safety and emergency response capacity.
Assess the potential administrative and operational burden of the project on the Local Services Board's volunteer-based governance model.
Challenge the Proponent's statement that 'The NWMO has no planned work to collect additional non-Indigenous land-use baseline data' and request a quantitative usage study of the 'unofficial trail system' and forestry roads identified in the submission.
Require the Proponent to conduct a specific Safety Interface Assessment regarding the interaction between Project industrial traffic and the identified 'unofficial' recreational users (ATV/Snowmobile) on forestry roads.
Require a specific impact assessment of the predicted 'in-migration' (Section 15.9.1) on the unorganized territory's zero-service capacity.
Challenge the conclusion in Section 15.9.3 that the economic baseline is 'sufficiently advanced' and request primary data collection for Melgund to replace suppressed Census figures.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate full self-sufficiency regarding the 'National Fire Code of Canada' and 'REGDOC-2.10.1 Nuclear Emergency Preparedness and Response' cited in Section 18.5 and Table 18.1.
Request specific details on how the 'safety case' and 'security' provisions cited in the CNSC licensing section will address the complete absence of local emergency services (fire, ambulance, police) in Melgund.
Challenge the Proponent's reliance on the NFWA Section 18(a) 'triennial' reporting cycle for socio-economic effects and request a specific commitment to annual or real-time monitoring for the unorganized territory of Melgund.
Contest the exclusively positive framing of Assessment Endpoints for Non-Indigenous Economic Conditions, specifically the metrics focused solely on 'Enhancing' participation and revenue.
Request the formal inclusion of the Local Services Board of Melgund in the collaborative process for confirming mitigation measures, which currently only lists 'WLON and the Township of Ignace' (Section 19.2.2.2.2).
Challenge the Proponent's reliance on standard 'emergency and spill response protocols' (Section 19.2.2.2.2) and demand a demonstration of full project self-sufficiency for fire, spill, and accident response.
Request the explicit inclusion of Melgund (Dyment/Borups Corners) as a named primary stakeholder in the 'transportation plans' communication strategy, rather than grouping it under 'other local communities'.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% self-sufficiency in emergency response capacity for 'hazardous and non-hazardous waste management' incidents and 'road wash-outs' identified in the screening table.
Require the inclusion of Melgund residents and seasonal land users as distinct 'sensitive receptors' in the upcoming Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment (HHERA), ensuring they are not aggregated with the Township of Ignace.
Challenge the Proponent's definition of 'sensitive receptors' and 'nearest community' to explicitly include residents and seasonal dwellings within the unorganized territory of Melgund (Dyment/Borups Corners).
Require the Proponent to demonstrate 100% self-sufficient emergency response capacity for failures within the 'integrated water management system' (e.g., pump failure, storage overflow).
Formally challenge the exclusion of the Local Services Board of Melgund from the list of entities receiving site-specific mitigation measures and monitoring requirements.
Demand a 'Self-Sufficient Response Plan' for water contamination events, specifically addressing the scenario where storm events reduce 'sediment and erosion control effectiveness.'
Require the inclusion of baseline fish tissue toxicology data (mercury, heavy metals) for species consumed by local residents as part of the 'non-Indigenous health conditions' assessment.
Demand specific maximum capacity limits and time duration caps for the 'temporary dry storage' of used fuel modules at the UFPP surface facility.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate full emergency response self-sufficiency for the 'two trucks per day' of radioactive shipments and associated logistics, specifically addressing the lack of local capacity.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate full emergency response self-sufficiency during the proposed 13-year 'Site Preparation and Construction' phase (2030-2042).
Challenge the feasibility of the 'emergency response plan' requirement cited in Tables 12.1 (Option 1) and 12.4 (Option 4) regarding transportation, specifically demanding the Proponent demonstrate self-sufficiency.
Request the inclusion of 'Community Polarization' and 'Stigma' as formal Valued Components (VCs) with defined measurement indicators, citing their specific mention in Objective 4.
Challenge the Proponent's claim of providing 'appropriate contingency action' for transportation accidents and unplanned events (Objective 2) by demanding a demonstration of 100% self-sufficiency in emergency response.
Challenge the Proponent's reference to 'preventive measures to evacuate residents' by demanding a detailed operational plan that demonstrates 100% Proponent self-sufficiency, rather than reliance on municipal support.
Require a cumulative effects assessment that explicitly models the inclusion of Intermediate-Level Waste (ILW) and non-fuel High-Level Waste, as referenced in the Integrated Strategy section of the filing.
Request the specific methodology, metrics, and data used to determine the 'willingness' of the unorganized communities of Dyment and Borups Corners, distinct from the Township of Ignace.
Challenge the Proponent's assertion that the project will 'safeguard... human health' by requiring a detailed gap analysis of emergency response capabilities within Melgund Township.
Request a disaggregated report of the 'nationwide surveys,' 'focus groups,' and 'discussion sessions' cited in Section 12.1.3.1, specifically isolating data collected from residents of Dyment, Borups Corners, and Melgund Township.
Challenge the 'illustrative conceptual engineering designs' used during the dialogue process to determine if they explicitly disclosed Melgund's lack of emergency services (fire/ambulance) to participants.
Challenge the methodology of the 'Scenarios Exercise' which limited 'detailed scenarios' to only 25 years, and request detailed socio-economic modeling that spans the full operational life of the project.
Request the specific 'Health and Safety' papers commissioned in Phase 1 to audit them for assumptions regarding local emergency response capacity.
Request a specific demographic breakdown of the '462 Canadians' who participated in the National Citizens Dialogue to confirm if any residents of Melgund (Dyment/Borups Corners) were included.
Request the 'preliminary analysis of alternative management approaches' to determine if the 'availability of local emergency response infrastructure' was a weighted criterion in the Assessment Team's review.
Request a screening-level Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA) specifically for the 'harvested' ecosites where soil metal exceedances were identified.
Formally dispute the Proponent's conclusion that the visual environment baseline is 'sufficiently complete' and demand a technical Viewshed Analysis.
Request a baseline Human Health Risk screening regarding the reported E. coli and Mercury exceedances in local watercourses (Mennin and Wabigoon rivers) to assess safety for recreational and subsistence use.
Request a detailed impact analysis on the specific wild rice stands (Mennin Lake and 10 others) and medicinal plant locations (balsam fir/poplar) identified in the text, specifically regarding access and contamination risks.
Request a specific socio-economic usage study regarding the 'wild rice stand identified on the north shore of Mennin Lake,' which the filing notes 'may be important as a food supply for... local community members.'
Require the immediate collection and inclusion of socio-demographic data for Melgund Township to rectify the admitted lack of representation for unincorporated communities in the Initial Project Description.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate a fully self-sufficient security and policing plan to satisfy the commitment to MMIWG Call for Justice #13, without reliance on local resources.
Contest the exclusion of off-site transportation from the Project scope, specifically the statement that 'transportation of used fuel... beyond primary and secondary access roads' is regulated separately.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate full self-sufficiency regarding the 'emergency preparedness and response plans' cited in the submission, specifically for fire, medical, and spill response.
Challenge the confidentiality of the 'Hosting Agreement' specifically regarding provisions for regional emergency response, infrastructure maintenance, and community safety definitions.
Request the specific operational details of the 'social safety' framework and the implementation plan for 'Call for Justice 13' regarding extractive industries, as cited in the Proponent's submission.
Formally oppose the Proponent's submission that IAA Section 7 prohibitions should not apply to social and economic programs, unless Melgund is granted equivalent status to Host Communities in NFWA reporting.
Challenge the Proponent's stated 'emergency preparedness and response plans' to demonstrate 100% on-site self-sufficiency, explicitly prohibiting reliance on Melgund's local resources.
Reference the Proponent's claim that 'Protecting people... must remain the highest priority' and request a 'Service Capacity Gap Analysis' specifically for Melgund, addressing the total absence of local emergency services (Fire/Ambulance) in the unorganized territory.
Challenge the Proponent's definition of 'Host' which explicitly names 'Wabigoon Lake Ojibway Nation and the Township of Ignace' while excluding the Local Services Board of Melgund (Dyment/Borups Corners), and request a specific 'Willingness Assessment' for the unorganized residents at the project site.
Clarify the definition of 'Safety' within the Regulatory Assessment and Approval Process (RAAP) and how it integrates with the safety requirements of non-Indigenous neighbors.
Request a quantitative projection of the 'returning home' population mentioned in the submission and analyze the cumulative impact on regional emergency service hubs (Ignace/Dryden).
Request the inclusion of 'Unorganized Territory Well-being' as a distinct Valued Component, separate from the Township of Ignace's 'six foundational pillars'.
Regarding the 'Infrastructure' pillar cited in the Ignace Hosting Agreement, demand the Proponent demonstrate 100% emergency response self-sufficiency (Fire, Ambulance, Security) specifically for the Revell site.
Request a detailed Security and Social Impact Management Plan for the Worker Accommodation Camp that specifically addresses the lack of local policing in the unorganized territory.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% self-sufficiency in emergency response capabilities, specifically regarding the proposed 'firewater pipeline' and fire protection infrastructure.
Assess the impact of project-related traffic increases on Highway 17 specifically regarding accident response times for Melgund residents.
Request a specific baseline assessment of housing and infrastructure capacity within the unorganized territory of Melgund, distinct from the Ignace-focused data.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% self-sufficiency for emergency response at the Revell site, rather than relying on the support for Ignace emergency services mentioned in the Hosting Agreement.
Request a detailed comparative safety analysis of the proposed vertical shaft design versus a ramp access system, specifically addressing the 'evacuation options' and 'fire scenarios' cited in the submission.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate full emergency response self-sufficiency at the Revell site, specifically addressing the text's reference to 'how local emergency personnel will be trained and resourced.'
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate emergency response self-sufficiency following engagement with the Ministry of Emergency Preparedness and Response.
Address the safety implications of the admitted 'sporadic' engagement with Transport Canada due to 'capacity constraints'.
Challenge the Proponent's classification of Melgund as an 'Inform' tier stakeholder and demand elevation to 'Involve' status regarding the 'infrastructure considerations' cited in Section 4.5.
Challenge the sufficiency of 'public information sources' for establishing a regional socio-economic baseline and require a specific data-gathering program for the unorganized territories of Dyment and Borups Corners.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate full emergency response self-sufficiency for the proposed on-site standby power generation facilities and associated fuel storage.
Challenge the Proponent's claim of 'protection of people' by demanding a detailed emergency response strategy that addresses the specific lack of local infrastructure in Melgund.
Challenge the sufficiency of a 'conceptual' post-closure safety analysis and demand the inclusion of definitive 'bounding scenarios' for long-term containment failure within the initial Impact Statement.
Assess the emergency response protocols for the proposed 'rail spur' and 'onsite access roads,' specifically regarding derailment or hazardous material spills.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% onsite emergency response self-sufficiency regarding the proposed 'explosives storage' and 'surface facilities' (340 hectares).
Request a detailed socio-economic impact analysis of the '800-bed worker accommodation camp' specifically focusing on the strain it will place on regional policing and health services utilized by Melgund residents.
Require a Traffic Impact Assessment that specifically models accident response times from regional hubs (Ignace/Dryden) for the 'high traffic volumes and large vehicles' planned for the Highway 17 intersection.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% on-site emergency response self-sufficiency regarding the proposed 'Temporary fuel facility', 'Explosives Management Area', and 'fire water' distribution systems, explicitly excluding reliance on Melgund Township resources.
Assess the safety protocols for 'mobile explosives loading trucks' accessing the 'explosives magazine' located away from the central service area.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% self-sufficiency regarding the 'fire protection systems' and 'Emergency Response Building' proposed for the construction phase.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% self-sufficiency for underground extraction, rescue, and major fire suppression, rather than relying on the 'refuge stations' and basic 'fire extinguishers' described.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% emergency response self-sufficiency for the listed 'fuel storage buildings', 'UFPP' hot cells, and 'active liquid waste' facilities.
Request a detailed safety analysis of 'concurrent' underground development and waste emplacement, focusing on vibration and accident risks.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% self-sufficiency for emergency response services (fire, ambulance, spill response) required for the 'construction of facilities' (e.g., concrete batch plant) and 'decommissioning of surface structures' described in the text.
Demand the Proponent demonstrate 100% self-sufficiency for fire and medical response during the site clearing and blasting phases identified in the pathways of change.
Demand the Proponent demonstrate 100% self-sufficiency in emergency response capacity for accidents related to blasting, site clearing, and construction activities mentioned in the filing.
Demand the Proponent demonstrate 100% self-sufficiency for emergency response related to wildlife-vehicle interactions on project-access roads, given the predicted displacement of wildlife due to sensory disturbances.
Demand the Proponent provide a comprehensive plan for 100% on-site emergency medical, fire, and mental health crisis response capacity for the project site and accommodation camp.
Demand a formal risk screening for 'Non-Indigenous Economic Conditions' that specifically evaluates the adverse effects of local price inflation, housing displacement, and regional economic disparity.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% self-sufficiency for emergency response and physical safety services for all Project phases, including the worker accommodation camp and transportation corridors.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% self-sufficiency in emergency response and security capacity, given the lack of local services in Melgund.
Demand the inclusion of 'Perception of Risk' as a formal Valued Component (VC) within the Human Health and Environmental Risk Assessment (HHERA).
Demand the Proponent demonstrate 100% self-sufficiency for fire and emergency response capacity specifically for the high-volume propane and natural gas storage and combustion infrastructure identified in the filing.
Require the Proponent to demonstrate how the Environmental Management System (EMS) will achieve 100% self-sufficiency in emergency response for environmental accidents or spills, without reliance on external municipal services.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% self-sufficiency in emergency response (Fire, Medical, Security) for the project site and transportation routes within Melgund Township.
Address the admitted data deficiencies regarding the characterization of populations in unincorporated communities by conducting primary socio-economic and cultural baseline studies in Melgund/Dyment.
Demand a detailed Social Management Plan that actions MMIWG Call for Justice 13 by providing 100% of the required emergency and security capacity for the project site and surrounding unincorporated areas.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% self-sufficiency for emergency response (Fire, Medical, and Security) for the Project site and associated transportation corridors, rather than relying on regional hubs.
Demand the Proponent clarify the 'municipal-level services' referenced for the Melgund Local Service Board and explicitly acknowledge the total absence of local emergency response capacity in the baseline safety assessment.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% self-sufficiency for emergency response (Fire, EMS, and Police) for the project site and associated traffic incidents on Highway 17 and Dyment Road.
Request a comprehensive baseline assessment of Dyment Road and adjacent routes, evaluating their current condition and capacity to handle heavy project traffic without compromising resident safety.
Require the Proponent to include 'Emergency Response Self-Sufficiency' as a specific Valued Component (VC) in the upcoming IPD and engagement materials, specifically addressing the zero-capacity reality of Melgund.
Demand a localized engagement strategy that accounts for Melgund's lack of municipal infrastructure and provides independent technical support for residents to interpret 'Technical Workshops' and 'Baseline Studies'.
Demand the Proponent demonstrate 100% emergency response self-sufficiency within the 'Mitigation, Protection and Enhancement' commitments (Section 4 of the Proponent's submission).
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% emergency response self-sufficiency for the project site and surrounding township, addressing the critical gap in fire, police, and ambulance services identified in the infrastructure planning section of the filing.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate the fire suppression self-sufficiency for the proposed 'battery-powered underground mobile fleet' and associated charging infrastructure.
Demand the Proponent provide a comprehensive Emergency Response Plan for transportation incidents occurring within Melgund Township, specifically addressing the 'fire and impact' resistance claims of the certified packages.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% self-sufficiency for emergency response and medical services for all Project phases.
Request a detailed transportation safety and enforcement plan that specifically addresses traffic management in unorganized territories lacking local police.
Request a technical evaluation of the proposed Highway 17 intersection designs to ensure they prioritize unimpeded access for regional emergency vehicles traveling from Dryden and Ignace.
Demand the Proponent provide a comprehensive Emergency Services Self-Sufficiency Plan that accounts for the total absence of local fire, police, and ambulance services in Melgund Township.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate 100% self-sufficiency in fire suppression and emergency response capacity for the proposed heating plant and associated industrial infrastructure.
Require the Proponent to establish and justify specific, quantitative thresholds for negligible and low impacts on air quality, noise levels, and water chemistry that are calibrated to the existing pristine baseline of the Melgund area.
Require the inclusion of 'Acoustic Integrity' and 'Recreational Land Value' as specific Valued Components (VCs) to assess the impact of emissions and industrial noise on local hunting and trail networks.
Require a quantitative assessment of the total acreage of 'land clearing' and the resulting loss of carbon sequestration capacity, paired with a localized reforestation strategy.
Request the immediate installation of baseline acoustic and light-pollution monitoring stations within Melgund Township (Dyment/Borups Corners) to establish current ambient levels before site preparation.
Require the Proponent to define specific 'regional infrastructure' improvements for the Highway 17 corridor within Melgund Township as part of the socio-economic effects monitoring.
Demand the implementation of localized acoustic and vibration baseline monitoring within a 10km radius of the project site, specifically targeting the residential areas of Melgund and Dyment.
Require the inclusion of 'Non-Radiological Air Quality' (specifically particulate matter from bentonite and concrete production) as a distinct Valued Component, based on the plan for 'sealing materials and buffer boxes manufactured on site.'
Request the inclusion of 'Local Recreational Land Access and Solitude' as a specific Valued Component (VC) to assess impacts on hunting, fishing, and trail use in the Revell site vicinity.
Request a specific baseline condition assessment and maintenance agreement for 'Dyment Road', identified in Section 10.1 as a location for preliminary work and tree harvesting operations.
Demand the establishment of baseline acoustic and light-pollution monitoring stations within Melgund Township (Dyment/Borups Corners) to protect the 'dark sky' and quiet rural character mentioned in the Initial Project Description's environmental change sections.
Assess the security and policing plans for the 'Accommodation camp' listed in Table 10.1, specifically regarding the management of the transient workforce in an area with no local police presence.
Request specific noise, vibration, and dust dispersion modelling for the 'Temporary rock crusher' and 'Temporary concrete batch plant' listed in Table 10.1.
Require the establishment of local air quality and noise baseline monitoring stations at community-sensitive locations, such as the Dyment Recreation Hall, to validate future compliance with provincial standards.
Request specific, quantifiable performance metrics for the 'best available technologies' proposed to reduce direct greenhouse gas emissions and associated atmospheric pollutants.
Establish a baseline acoustic monitoring program in the residential areas of Dyment and Borups Corners to measure current ambient noise levels prior to construction and industrialization.
Demand the inclusion of 'Informal Recreational and Subsistence Land Use' as a specific Valued Component (VC), requiring the mapping of all 'unofficial' trails, hunting blinds, and gathering areas used by Melgund residents.
Request a comprehensive noise and vibration impact study with specific monitoring receptors placed at the Melgund Township residential borders and the Dyment Recreation Hall.
Request the specific methodology and baseline data used to substantiate the claim that the Project contributes to 'net-zero emissions,' specifically regarding the carbon impact of site preparation and deforestation in the local area.
Demand 3D viewshed modeling and light pollution simulations from specific residential vantage points in Borups Corners and Dyment to assess the industrialization of the rural landscape.
Request a comprehensive mapping and baseline study of all existing informal and formal trails, hunting grounds, and resource access points within the Wabigoon and Dryden Forest Management Units that will be affected by the planned Crown land transfer.
Demand a comparative traffic safety and noise study for the 'primary and secondary access road alignments' specifically focusing on the proximity to residential clusters in Dyment and Borups Corners.
Request specific mitigation and monitoring plans for dust and runoff for the various 'ERMA' (Excavated Rock Management Area) configurations mentioned in the filing.
Request a detailed definition of "Institutional Control" (2193+) and "Extended monitoring" (2093–2192) specifically regarding permissible community land use, recreation access, and resource harvesting rights during these periods.
Require the Proponent to model environmental effects (specifically noise, vibration, and air quality/dust) based on a continuous 13-year "Site Preparation and Construction" duration.
Request confirmation that the baseline data collection for 'local lakes and ecosystems' (Section 5.3.2) includes water bodies and land within the Melgund LSB jurisdiction, distinct from the data collected for the Township of Ignace.
Require the inclusion of 'Regional Evacuation Safety' as a Valued Component, addressing the specific design concerns raised regarding the 'absence of a ramp' and reliance on vertical shafts (Section 5.3.2).
Require the inclusion of water bodies within Melgund Township in the "safeguarding of water" and "interconnected systems of water" baseline studies mentioned in the Reconciliation Journey section.
Quantify the impact of "loss of access to lands" and "habitat disturbance" (Section 4.2.1) on the recreational and subsistence activities of Melgund Township residents.
Request the specific technical baseline data for 'land' and 'water' quality at the Revell Site perimeter that underpins the text's commitment to 'protection and stewardship.'
Contest the classification of 'perceived concerns' regarding land and water use, and mandate the inclusion of 'Stigma-Induced Economic Loss' as a distinct Valued Component.
Request the immediate establishment of air and water quality baseline monitoring stations specifically within the Melgund/Dyment geographic boundary.
Define the geographic extent of proposed 'restrictions on access' and develop a legally binding 'Recreation and Access Guarantee' for local trail networks.
Request a detailed map and list of proposed environmental monitoring stations, specifically identifying locations within Melgund Township and the Revell area used for local harvesting.
Demand that the 'Safety Case' include a specific assessment of the 'stigma effect' on local property values and the long-term viability of the Dyment Recreation Hall.
Request detailed site maps and footprint specifications for the 'licensed facilities' intended for interim LLW/ILW storage to assess cumulative land clearing and runoff impacts.
Request a comprehensive transportation safety plan specifically for the eventual removal of LLW and ILW from the Revell site through Borups Corners.
Demand the inclusion of 'Recreational Land Connectivity and Trail Access' as a Valued Component (VC) to assess the impact of fencing and the primary access road on local land use.
Require a site-specific noise and light pollution assessment for the Dyment and Borups Corners residential areas, specifically accounting for the proposed helipad and 24/7 worker camp operations.
Require a comprehensive baseline study of existing recreational land use, including snowmobile/ATV trails and traditional hunting/fishing grounds within a 10km radius of the Revell site.
Establish a long-term governance and socio-economic monitoring framework that includes direct representation from the Melgund Local Services Board for the duration of the 160-year project.
Demand the disclosure of localized groundwater and acoustic baseline data specifically for the 10km radius surrounding the Revell site, including connectivity studies to Melgund Township aquifers.
Request a detailed assessment of alternative site access routes and transportation schedules that minimize heavy industrial traffic through the Highway 17 corridor during peak local recreation and school bus hours.
Require the establishment of high-fidelity acoustic baselines and vibration monitoring within the residential areas of Dyment and Borups Corners, rather than just at the Revell site boundary.
Establish a long-term 'Community Well-being and Recreation' monitoring program to track the impact of industrialization on local land access and the Dyment Recreation Hall.
Require a detailed inventory and mapping of existing recreational trails, hunting grounds, and fishing access points within a 15 km radius of the Revell Site to be included in the Environmental Baseline.
Demand a detailed spatial analysis and mapping of all proposed 'changes in access' to Crown lands, identifying specific exclusion zones and their impact on local non-Indigenous land use such as wood harvesting, hunting, and recreation.
Request the specific technical methodologies used for the 'formal quantification of risk' mentioned in the submission, specifically asking how generic 'management approaches' were adapted to account for local site-specific conditions.
Designate 'Forestry Land Base' as a Valued Component and request a quantitative assessment of the impact of the 17,600 ha withdrawal on the Wabigoon and Dryden Forest Management Units.
Challenge the reliance on Dryden Regional station data to fill on-site gaps, specifically citing the significant discrepancy in July 2022 rainfall (215.3 mm at Dryden vs 79.6 mm on-site).
Require site-specific geotechnical drilling and sampling in the 'valleys and wetland areas' where overburden is currently only 'inferred to be several metres thick' to establish precise depth and composition data.
Reject the use of 1980s desktop data (GBIF) for terrestrial invertebrates and the 'unoptimized' eDNA results for reptiles; mandate a new, comprehensive field program to establish a valid modern baseline for these groups.
Contest the exclusion of Woodland Caribou and Wolverine from the environmental baseline studies based solely on static distance buffers (61 km and 80 km, respectively) and request a connectivity/corridor analysis.
Request the raw data and specific concentration levels for the Plutonium-238, Plutonium-239, and Strontium-90 detected in soil samples, rather than accepting the qualitative attribution to 'historical global nuclear weapons' fallout.
Require the Proponent to update the 'Traditional Foods' baseline data with contemporary field studies (2024-2025) rather than relying on literature from 2014 and 2016.
Request site-specific baseline abundance data for furbearers and black bears within the specific overlapping management units (Trapline DR024, Bear Management Area IG-09A-040) identified in the submission.
Evaluate the environmental trade-offs of the 'Aggregate Permit' for a dedicated quarry/pit (Table 18.3) versus sourcing aggregates off-site.
Request confirmation that the 'Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment (HHERA)' updates will explicitly include baseline data from Melgund Township, distinct from the 'Host' communities of Ignace and WLON.
Challenge the assertion in Footnote (a) that 'changes in climate change indicators due to the Project do not directly affect other VCs'.
Request a specific definition of 'sensitive receptors' for air quality monitoring that explicitly includes individual rural residences and tourist operations in Melgund, rather than limiting the definition to 'hospitals, schools, or community areas' (Section 19.2.2.3).
Challenge the validity of using 'conventional mining projects' (Section 19.2.3) as the sole proxy for assessing construction effects and determining mitigation suitability.
Request that 'Quiet Rural Enjoyment' be assessed as a distinct component of the Noise/Vibration assessment, beyond standard regulatory compliance (NPC-300).
Require the establishment of specific baseline monitoring stations for surface water and groundwater quality within Melgund Township to validate the claim that changes will be 'measurable' but 'low-degree'.
Formally oppose the Proponent's proposal to limit the Impact Assessment Act (IAA) review only to components with 'moderate to extreme risks,' thereby attempting to exclude Air Quality based on a preliminary 'Low Risk' screening.
Request a specific baseline study of 'Dark Sky' quality and ambient soundscapes within the unorganized territory to quantify the current 'remote' conditions.
Request the specific geochemical sampling density and methodology used to determine that all excavated rock is 'non-acid generating'.
Challenge the Proponent to demonstrate the resilience of the 'water management system' and 'storage capacity' against extreme climate events (e.g., 100-year storms, rapid spring freshet) rather than relying on standard 'industry experience.'
Challenge the Proponent's assertion that the Project site contains 'no unique or rare topographical features' and is merely 'typical of the Canadian Shield,' and request a mechanism to incorporate local knowledge into topographical mapping.
Request specific evidence and case studies demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed 'proven' mitigation measures for preventing soil contamination from fugitive dust and effluent in conditions similar to the Melgund area.
Request specific quantitative definitions and thresholds for the terms 'Negligible degree' and 'Moderate likelihood' used in the residual effects risk screening.
Request a detailed inventory and management plan for secondary waste streams generated by the 'copper application and machining cell' and 'welding' processes described in the UFPP workflow.
Establish baseline air quality monitoring parameters specifically for silica and particulate matter associated with the proposed on-site 'concrete batch plant' and 'sealing material compaction plant'.
Establish comprehensive baseline monitoring for groundwater, surface water, and air quality that explicitly models the 'significant changes... associated with climate change' referenced in Objective 6.
Request the index and content of the 'Science and Environment' papers commissioned in Phase 1 to determine if they utilized local site-specific data or generic geological models.
Require the Proponent to disclose the full list of '14 technical methods' and the specific environmental criteria used to exclude options, clarifying whether social preference ('what they heard') or technical safety was the primary filter.
Challenge the statement that there is 'no evidence' of landslides or liquefaction by requiring a forward-looking geohazard assessment that models slope stability and ground integrity over the repository's full lifecycle.
Mandate the integration of surface hydrology data with deep geological models to address the identified gap in 'details of the surface and near-surface environment.'
Mandate the immediate inclusion of 'overburden' and 'construction materials' in the geochemical baseline testing program to establish background salinity and metal levels.
Challenge the reliance on 'matrix porosity' (0.45%) as the primary indicator for radionuclide retardation and request the inclusion of fracture network hydraulic conductivity as a specific Valued Component indicator.
Challenge the Proponent to provide geochemical evidence (e.g., isotopic analysis or regional background comparisons) validating the claim that exceedances of metals (Aluminum, Chromium, Hexavalent Chromium, etc.) in soil and sediment are solely 'natural' and 'reflect the local geology.'
Request justification for the cessation of topography baseline studies, specifically requiring an analysis of how the 'long, narrow valleys' and 'structural features' identified in the text influence surface drainage toward Mennin Lake.
Request the expansion of the baseline light data collection program to include winter monitoring periods.
Request justification for the limited two-week duration of the seasonal noise monitoring program and assess the need for longer-term continuous monitoring.
Request a detailed 'Source Identification Study' for the reported exceedances of E. coli, mercury, and copper in the Mennin and Wabigoon rivers.
Require detailed technical protocols for how the 'groundwater-surface water interface' will be characterized and monitored, beyond the general description provided.
Request clarification on the source and location of the 'treated sewage effluent' parameters (e.g., total coliforms) currently being monitored in the surface water quality program.
Reject the justification that local wetland loss is acceptable because 'northern Ontario is not considered a region... where wetland loss... has reached critical levels.'
Challenge the methodology used to claim the Project site has 'lower biodiversity' than the surrounding region, specifically the reliance on marsh density as the sole proxy for biodiversity value.
Request immediate physical ground-truthing (netting or electrofishing) for the 26 species detected solely via eDNA metabarcoding in the Regional and Local Investigation Areas.
Require a dynamic impact assessment that models fish passage scenarios assuming the natural failure or removal of the identified 'beaver dam' barriers.
Require the assessment of 'functional' critical habitat for Species at Risk (specifically Eastern Whip-poor-will) rather than limiting the scope to legally 'designated' critical habitat.
Request a detailed map and operational definition of the 'changes in access' to land and water referenced in the Proponent's submission.
Demand site-specific noise and vibration modeling for receptors in Dyment and Borups Corners regarding the proposed 'blasting and excavation' activities.
Require the establishment of specific baseline monitoring stations within Melgund Township boundaries for the 'evaluation of potential changes to air, water, land' referenced in the Impact Statement methodology.
Citing the 'technical evaluation' referenced in the text as a driver for site confirmation, request the specific geological and hydrological baseline reports for the Revell Site area that supported this decision.
Request the immediate disclosure of the specific 'technical studies' regarding land, air, and water referenced as part of the WLON learning journey.
Challenge the Proponent's reliance on 'Two previous environmental assessments' to justify safety; require site-specific geological and hydrological baseline data for the Revell site.
Request technical specifications for the management of excavated rock to control dust and leachate, distinct from the proposed cultural handling protocols.
Require the establishment of baseline monitoring stations for noise, vibration, and air quality specifically located at residential receptors in Dyment and Borups Corners.
Request the specific technical data regarding 'Great Lakes safety' that triggered US legislative opposition.
Evaluate the design and containment alternatives for the surface 'low-level waste (LLW) and intermediate-level waste (ILW) storage facilities' to ensure zero-leakage performance.
Require the immediate identification of the 'local water body or groundwater source' intended for fresh water supply, moving this from a 'future study' to a baseline requirement.
Request a strict definition of the term 'where practicable' regarding the commitment to time clearing and grubbing activities outside of the bird nesting season (mid-May through mid-July).
Request a specific impact assessment for the 'controlled drill and blast' excavation technique, focusing on the atmospheric discharge of blasting fumes via the 'exhaust ventilation shaft'.
Require detailed design specifications for the containment and treatment of liquid waste generated in the underground 'wash bay' and 'maintenance shop' to prevent groundwater contamination.
Quantify the projected air quality and particulate emissions from the on-site 'Manufacturing of cementitious and bentonite sealing materials' and 'Concrete batch plant'.
Request a technical assessment of the environmental implications of 'co-emplacement' of Low-Level Waste (LLW) underground versus off-site disposal, specifically focusing on potential chemical interactions with the host rock and groundwater.
Require the Proponent to define specific ecological thresholds for noise, vibration, and light emissions rather than using the radiological 'ALARA' standard cited in the Initial Project Description.
Request a regional habitat connectivity and fragmentation analysis that includes wide-ranging carnivores such as the wolverine and cougar, rather than dismissing them based on current density or distance from the project site.
Validate that impacts on traditional land and resource use will be assessed as physical and biological changes to the environment, rather than being limited to 'perceived risks' or 'changes in access'.
Demand the integration of local land-use and hydrological knowledge into the baseline studies for the waterways and geography identified in the Proponent's site maps.
Require the integration of local ecological knowledge from Melgund-based 'Tourist Outfitters' into the baseline data for terrestrial wildlife and fish habitats.
Require the Proponent to define the specific waste inventory as a Valued Component (VC) and provide a definitive policy statement on the permanent vs. temporary status of intermediate-level waste.
Demand the establishment of clear, predefined triggers and thresholds for what constitutes 'as warranted' regarding additional studies for terrestrial wildlife, carnivores, and invertebrates mentioned in Section 14.10 of the filing.
Request the specific criteria and baseline data used to define 'environmentally sensitive features' (wetlands and watercourses) that the centralized site layout claims to avoid.
Request a precise geographic definition of 'surrounding lands' regarding the prohibition of recreational hunting and fishing by non-local staff and detail the enforcement mechanism.
Challenge the Proponent to define specific environmental triggers and immediate mitigation protocols for 'road wash-out' events that could isolate the site or the community.
Require the Proponent to provide a conceptual framework for the 70-year extended monitoring period, specifically identifying the thermal and radiological indicators that will be tracked post-operation.
Require the development and implementation of the Greenhouse Gas Management Plan (GHGMP) prior to the start of site preparation and construction, rather than 'prior to operation'.
Request an updated 'Social Acceptability' baseline that specifically surveys current Melgund residents, rather than relying on the Phase 4 workshops which prioritized those 'involved in earlier phases'.
Challenge the Proponent's exclusion of Melgund Township from the 'collaborative design' of baseline programs and demand the immediate inclusion of the Local Services Board in all future study designs.
Request a clear definition of the 'potential socio-economic consequences' of the tissue sampling program referenced in Section 14.13.2, and demand a mitigation strategy for Stigma.
Request verification of the '20 seasonal residents' figure and the specific inclusion of Long Lake cabin owners in the 'Community and Culture' baseline assessment.
Require a mitigation plan for Mental Health and Addiction services that addresses the Proponent's finding that 'existing supports and services are insufficient to address the need'.
Request disaggregated housing data for unorganized territories to contextualize the finding that 13.0% of dwellings in the Kenora CD need 'major repairs'.
Contest the assertion in Section 15.3.2 that the non-Indigenous health baseline is 'sufficiently advanced' given the identified gaps in mental health, addiction treatment, and senior services.
Formalize the proposed 'participatory tissue sampling program' into a scientifically rigorous, statistically valid monitoring campaign that does not rely solely on voluntary submissions.
The Proponent utilizes an 'optimistic growth scenario' based on the Ontario historical average (1.16%) for Ignace and Kenora CD, despite the text acknowledging a historical annual decline of -1.56% and a 53% drop in youth population in Ignace. Challenge this methodology and request a socio-economic impact assessment based on a 'Labour Shortage' scenario.
The filing highlights a significantly aging population in the study area (Ignace median age 53.6; LSB Wabigoon 49.2). Request a specific 'Vulnerable Population' impact assessment focusing on emergency evacuation times and access to chronic healthcare.
The Proponent's submission acknowledges that the Community Well-Being Index is based on unverified census data that may not reflect community values. The Working Group requests a 'Ground-Truthing' protocol to validate this data with local qualitative input from Melgund and Indigenous neighbours.
The Proponent's submission notes a 'lack of community gathering spaces' and funding for development in Melgund. The Working Group mandates the inclusion of 'Community Infrastructure Capacity' as a specific Valued Component (VC) for Melgund.
Assess the potential for 'spillover' housing impacts on Melgund due to capacity saturation in Ignace and Dryden.
Require the Proponent to demonstrate how Project-generated waste will not displace Melgund residents' access to the Dryden and Ignace landfills.
Require a capacity assessment of the 'MNR operates landfill sites' and 'Dryden landfill' referenced in the submission to determine if project waste will displace residential access.
Resolve the contradiction regarding social infrastructure by conducting a capacity audit of the 'local hall' versus the reported 'lack of community gathering spaces.'
Conduct a quantitative noise and vibration baseline study to define the acoustic parameters of the 'quiet community' characterization.
Request a Stage 2 Archaeological Assessment (field survey) for the 342-hectare Project site, rejecting the reliance solely on the 'desktop component of a Stage 1 archaeological assessment'.
Request a detailed analysis of potential 'cost of living' increases (Section 15.9.1) specifically for fixed-income seniors in unorganized territories.
Require a detailed safety analysis for the 'Entrance Permit' and 'highway turn off' on Highway 17 mentioned in Section 18.4 and Table 18.3.
Request a specific methodology for baselining the 'current balance and structure of communities' to support the Assessment Endpoint of 'Maintenance of local non-Indigenous social conditions'.
Request a detailed enforcement plan for the prohibition of non-local employees engaging in 'recreational hunting, fishing, or the use of all-terrain vehicles' on surrounding lands.
Assess the specific noise and vibration impacts of the 'rail spur' and 'access road' traffic on the quality of life for residents in Dyment and Borups Corners.
Request a baseline inventory of all downstream surface water users (drinking water, lodges, recreational) in the Melgund area to assess the impact of 'residual adverse effects' on human health.
Require a detailed 'Intergenerational Knowledge Transfer' plan for the 100-year 'Decommissioning and Closure' phase (2093-2192).
Require a detailed Research & Development roadmap for the 'retrieval technology' mentioned in Table 12.4, which the text admits 'would need to be further developed and demonstrated.'
Require a detailed assessment of how the 'civil disobedience' and 'societal breakdown' scenarios identified in Objective 5 will be managed given the lack of local policing in Melgund.
Require the Proponent to quantify the qualitative claim that radiological and non-radiological exposures are 'estimated to be very small' with specific numerical thresholds and receptor locations relevant to Melgund residents.
Require a comparative infrastructure analysis between Melgund Township and the 'communities that currently store used nuclear fuel' cited in the submission.
Demand a comprehensive emergency response and management plan specifically for the planned '10 deep boreholes and up to 10 shorter-length exploration boreholes' drilling program.
Assess the social and safety impacts of the 'worker accommodation camp' on the unorganized territory, specifically regarding policing and social friction.
Require a quantitative socio-economic assessment of the 'perception' impacts on land use mentioned in the submission, specifically focusing on property values and tourism in Melgund.
Request a redacted summary of the 'confidential' Wabigoon Lake Ojibway Nation (WLON) Hosting Agreement specifically regarding regional safety and infrastructure commitments.
Request the inclusion of 'Non-Indigenous Local Land Use' as a distinct Valued Component to assess impacts on hunting, agriculture, and recreation in Melgund.
Request the inclusion of 'Social Cohesion in Unorganized Territories' as a specific Valued Component, citing the exclusion of Melgund from the 'Willingness' vote described in Section 4.1.
Demand specific safety case documentation defining separation distances and scheduling restrictions for concurrent blasting and waste emplacement operations.
Clarify the role of Medical Officers of Health, specifically regarding the distinction between 'sharing the safety case' and conducting independent health assessments.
Contest the sufficiency of 'plain-language materials' for nearby communities and demand provision of raw technical data and independent review funding equal to the 'Involve' tier.
Request a localized socio-economic baseline that distinguishes Melgund Township's specific labor and business capacity from the broader 'Northwestern Ontario' region cited in the text.
Require the inclusion of 'Intergenerational Community Burden' as a Valued Component to counter-balance the Proponent's claim of 'advancement of intergenerational equity.'
Request a specific Socio-Economic Transition Plan for the 'Decommissioning and Closure' phases to be included in the IAA scope, despite the regulatory exclusion of these phases from the 'designated project' definition.
Define the specific implications of 'institutional control' and the prohibition of mining on local economic development and land use rights post-closure.
Require a definitive decision and impact analysis regarding the 'rail spur' which is currently described as only 'being considered' rather than confirmed.
Request a safety impact assessment regarding the 'concurrent' use of 'controlled drill and blast' excavation while Used Fuel Containers (UFCs) are being emplaced in adjacent panels.
Define the maximum duration and specific safety protocols for the 'interim' storage of Low-Level Waste (LLW) and Intermediate-Level Waste (ILW) generated during operations.
Assess the fire safety risks of the proposed 'battery powered vehicles' for underground use, specifically regarding thermal runaway suppression capabilities.
Require a formal definition and methodology for assessing 'society’s desire' regarding the timeline for repository closure, ensuring Melgund Township's specific consent is weighted distinctly from broader regional or national sentiment.
Require the Proponent to define the technical and economic criteria for 'practicability' regarding the avoidance of traditional medicinal plants (Balsam fir/poplar) and wild rice.
Request documentation on how Indigenous Traditional Knowledge (ITK) was integrated into the identification of bird species of concern and the assessment of pathways of change for traditional land use.
Require the Proponent to establish a formal funding mechanism to augment regional mental health and addiction services, moving beyond internal Employee Assistance Programs (EAP).
Request a site-specific Social Management Plan for the worker accommodation camp that includes dedicated security and traffic enforcement protocols for the Highway 17 and 603 corridors.
Request the establishment of an annual socio-economic monitoring and reporting framework for Melgund, rather than the three-year cycle mandated by the NFWA.
Request the expansion of the 'Human Environment' scope to include socio-economic risk perception and traditional land use that extends beyond formal 'Reserve' boundaries.
Request a non-confidential summary of economic benefit categories and regional infrastructure commitments that extend to unincorporated areas like Melgund.
Request the Proponent expand the scope of transportation safety and emission assessments to include the Highway 17 corridor through Melgund, rather than only the access roads 'after turn off from Highway 17'.
Require the Proponent to provide specific, quantified targets for 'improved infrastructure and services' within the unorganized territory of Melgund, rather than regional generalizations.
Request the inclusion of 'Stigma and Perceived Risk' as a specific Valued Component (VC) with a defined methodology for measuring socio-economic impacts on unorganized territories.
Request a specific accessibility audit of engagement methodologies for residents of unorganized territories, focusing on the digital divide and the physical distance to hubs like Ignace and Dryden.
Request a formal socio-economic impact study specifically for 'Unorganized Township Property Owners' in Melgund to address potential inequities in the 'Host' vs 'Other' community framework.
Request a 'Feedback Integration Framework' that specifically tracks and reports on how concerns from unorganized territories are weighted and addressed in the project design.
Request the specific criteria and standards for the 'Reconciliation and Engagement' commitments (Section 6 of the Proponent's submission) as they apply to residents of unorganized territories.
Request a detailed methodology for how the Proponent will bridge the socio-economic data gap between 2023 and the availability of the 2026 Census data mentioned in Section 15 of the Initial Project Description.
Request a detailed integration plan of the short-term microseismic data (collected since 2021) with long-term paleoseismological evidence to validate the claim of stability.
Assess the long-term socio-economic impacts of installing 'permanent markers' on local property values, land use, and community branding in Melgund Township.
Understanding the Impacts of Nuclear Waste on our Community
This digital archive houses the public comments submitted to the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada regarding Project 88774: The Nuclear Waste Management Organization Deep Geological Repository (DGR) for Canada's Used Nuclear Fuel Project. The impact assessment is led jointly by the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada and the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission. This archive preserves community perspectives, concerns, and observations shared during the assessment process, particularly in relation to Melgund Township, Northwestern Ontario and the communities of Dyment and Borups Corners who are the closest and most impacted of all in the process.