Require a detailed assessment of how the 'civil disobedience' and 'societal breakdown' scenarios identified in Objective 5 will be managed given the lack of local policing in Melgund.
Strategic Rationale
The Proponent's submission discusses security risks including 'civil disobedience' and 'societal breakdown.' As Melgund has no local police force, the management of these risks implies either a heavy reliance on distant OPP detachments or the introduction of private security forces. The Proponent must clarify how security will be maintained without compromising the safety, freedom of movement, or resources of local residents, ensuring that the 'Security' objective does not result in the militarization of the local community.
Source Context
Understanding the Impacts of Nuclear Waste on our Community
This digital archive houses the public comments submitted to the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada regarding Project 88774: The Nuclear Waste Management Organization Deep Geological Repository (DGR) for Canada's Used Nuclear Fuel Project. The impact assessment is led jointly by the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada and the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission. This archive preserves community perspectives, concerns, and observations shared during the assessment process, particularly in relation to Melgund Township, Northwestern Ontario and the communities of Dyment and Borups Corners who are the closest and most impacted of all in the process.