Request the specific technical methodologies used for the 'formal quantification of risk' mentioned in the submission, specifically asking how generic 'management approaches' were adapted to account for local site-specific conditions.
Strategic Rationale
"The submission states that specialists conducted a 'formal quantification of risk' on management approaches. However, if this quantification was paired with 'illustrative' regions rather than site-specific geological and hydrological data, the resulting risk profile may be invalid for the Revell site. The Environment Working Group must verify that the risk models account for the specific water table, soil composition, and drainage patterns of the local area. If the risk was quantified using generic assumptions, the Proponent must be required to re-calculate risk using local baseline data to ensure the protection of local land and water resources."
Source Context
Understanding the Impacts of Nuclear Waste on our Community
This digital archive houses the public comments submitted to the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada regarding Project 88774: The Nuclear Waste Management Organization Deep Geological Repository (DGR) for Canada's Used Nuclear Fuel Project. The impact assessment is led jointly by the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada and the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission. This archive preserves community perspectives, concerns, and observations shared during the assessment process, particularly in relation to Melgund Township, Northwestern Ontario and the communities of Dyment and Borups Corners who are the closest and most impacted of all in the process.