Request the Proponent provide an objective geochemical characterization protocol for excavated rock that removes the pre-determined language of 'confirming' non-toxicity as stated in Section 14.3 of the Initial Project Description.
Strategic Rationale
The Proponent's submission assumes the non-acid generating and non-toxic nature of the repository horizon rock before testing is complete. For the residents of Melgund, who rely on the integrity of the local watershed and groundwater, this confirmation bias is a significant concern. An objective assessment is required to ensure that any potential for acid rock drainage or metal leaching is identified early. By adopting a truly exploratory scientific approach, the Proponent can improve the credibility of the baseline data and ensure that mitigation strategies for rock piles are based on evidence rather than assumptions, ultimately protecting the local environment and community health.
Source Context
Understanding the Impacts of Nuclear Waste on our Community
This digital archive houses the public comments submitted to the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada regarding Project 88774: The Nuclear Waste Management Organization Deep Geological Repository (DGR) for Canada's Used Nuclear Fuel Project. The impact assessment is led jointly by the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada and the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission. This archive preserves community perspectives, concerns, and observations shared during the assessment process, particularly in relation to Melgund Township, Northwestern Ontario and the communities of Dyment and Borups Corners who are the closest and most impacted of all in the process.