Breaking Down the NWMO’s ‘Responsive Study Process’
In Northwestern Ontario, we are used to being heard only when it is convenient for the big players. As the Nuclear Waste Management Organization (NWMO) moves forward with the proposed Revell Site Deep Geological Repository, they have released details on their ‘Responsive Study Process.’ This was a three-year effort to talk to Canadians about how to handle nuclear fuel waste. For those of us in Melgund Township, Borups Corners, and Dyment, the big question is: did they actually hear us, or were we just a checkbox in a national survey?
What We Are Learning
The NWMO describes their process as a four-phase ‘dialogue.’ They say they wanted to ‘think out loud’ with the public to decide how to assess risks and design the project. They used surveys, workshops, and e-dialogues to gather what they call ‘representative feedback’ from across the country to shape their management plans.
The Reality Check
What is being promised: The NWMO claims the process was inclusive and that they sought ‘societal direction’ to drive their decisions.
What we need to verify: While they mention ‘nationwide surveys,’ there is no data showing how many people from our actual neighborhood were involved. A survey in a big city does not carry the same weight as a conversation in Dyment. We need to know if our specific local concerns were drowned out by general national opinions.
The Path Forward
The report noted that the claim of ‘representative feedback’ is currently unsubstantiated by local data; therefore, we are calling for a ‘Consultation Impact Table.’ This would be a clear map showing exactly what feedback was received from Melgund Township and how it forced a specific change in the Deep Geological Repository design or safety plans. We need to move past ‘thinking out loud’ and see concrete evidence of how our input changed the project.
Why It Matters Here
When you live less than 10 kilometers from the Revell Site, ‘conceptual designs’ are not enough to guarantee peace of mind. We need to know how this project affects our water, our hunting grounds, and the quiet safety of our roads. If the ‘direction’ for this project came from people who do not live here, our local lifestyle could be at risk. This is why the Impact Assessment must look closer at our specific corner of Northwestern Ontario.
Have Your Say
This affects our future. Submit your feedback on this specific issue via our Engage page to ensure the Impact Assessment Agency hears from our community.
The Melgund Integrated Nuclear Impact Assessment Project
The Impact Assessment Agency of Canada (IAAC) is reviewing the Nuclear Waste Management Organization’s (NWMO) proposed Deep Geological Repository (DGR) at the Revell Site, located near Ignace and Wabigoon Lake Ojibway Nation in Northwestern Ontario.
This major nuclear infrastructure project is undergoing a joint federal review by the IAAC and the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) to evaluate environmental, health, social, and Indigenous rights impacts over its projected 160-year lifecycle.
Public Feedback Open: Comments on the Initial Project Description are accepted until February 4, 2026. Submissions help shape the formal impact assessment guidelines.
This short article and summary is based on an initial analysis of a proponent’s initial project description. It does not represent, any community the NWMO or the Government of Canada. Learn more at the Melgund Integrated Nuclear Impact Assessment Project project page.
About the Author
