Decoding the Checklist: How the NWMO Plans to Measure Our Future
If you are driving down Highway 17 near Borups Corners or casting a line near Dyment, the landscape feels permanent. But as we look at the proposed Revell Site for the Deep Geological Repository, we have to ask: how do we measure the changes coming to Northwestern Ontario? The Nuclear Waste Management Organization (NWMO) recently released a technical table outlining the “Valued Components”—the things they promise to monitor, from air quality to our local economy. As residents of Melgund Township, it is our job to look past the acronyms and understand exactly what is being measured in this Impact Assessment.
What We Are Learning
The NWMO has provided a list distinguishing between “Intermediate Components” (physical things like water flow, air quality, and noise) and “Valued Components” (living things like fish, birds, and human health). The logic is that the physical stuff affects the living stuff. They have listed “Measurement Indicators” for each—basically, the checklist of data they intend to collect to see if the project is affecting our environment or our way of life.
The Reality Check
When we look closely at the columns in Table 19.1, we see a difference between what is being promised and what is currently on paper.
- What is being promised: The NWMO claims they will monitor hydrogeology (groundwater) and air quality to protect the ecosystem.
- What we need to verify: In the “Assessment Endpoint” column for these physical factors, the table currently reads “Not applicable.” This suggests that unless a fish dies or a person gets sick (the “Valued Components”), the change in water or air itself might not have a defined “stop” signal in this specific framework.
- What is being promised: A look at the economic impacts on our communities.
- What we need to verify: The indicators listed focus heavily on “enhancing” revenue and business. This positive bias risks overlooking the costs, such as strain on local infrastructure or inflation, which are real concerns for us.
The Path Forward
We have identified a significant gap in the documentation. The report lists “Not applicable” for assessment endpoints regarding water and air quality, relying instead on how these affect plants and animals later down the line. This is a reactive approach, not a proactive one.
The Solution: We are calling for the NWMO to adopt established federal and provincial environmental quality guidelines as hard assessment endpoints for these intermediate components right now. We shouldn’t wait for the fish population to decline to know our water quality has dropped. Furthermore, the indicators for Indigenous impacts are currently listed as “To be defined.” To ensure respect and safety, a collaborative framework must be established immediately to define these indicators before any major baselines are set.
Why It Matters Here
For those of us in Melgund Township and surrounding areas, this isn’t just data—it’s our lifestyle. If the groundwater shifts or the noise levels rise, it affects the silence of the hunt and the safety of our well water. We need to know that the “stop work” thresholds are based on the first sign of physical change in the environment, not just the eventual impact on wildlife. Additionally, relying on undefined indicators for our Indigenous neighbours means the assessment is currently incomplete regarding the cultural heritage of this land.
Have Your Say
This affects our future. Submit your feedback on this specific issue via our Engage page to ensure the Impact Assessment Agency hears from our community.
The Melgund Integrated Nuclear Impact Assessment Project
The Impact Assessment Agency of Canada (IAAC) is reviewing the Nuclear Waste Management Organization’s (NWMO) proposed Deep Geological Repository (DGR) at the Revell Site, located near Ignace and Wabigoon Lake Ojibway Nation in Northwestern Ontario.
This major nuclear infrastructure project is undergoing a joint federal review by the IAAC and the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) to evaluate environmental, health, social, and Indigenous rights impacts over its projected 160-year lifecycle.
Public Feedback Open: Comments on the Initial Project Description are accepted until February 4, 2026. Submissions help shape the formal impact assessment guidelines.
This short article and summary is based on an initial analysis of a proponent’s initial project description. It does not represent, any community the NWMO or the Government of Canada. Learn more at the Melgund Integrated Nuclear Impact Assessment Project project page.
About the Author
