Decoding the Fine Print for Our Community
For those of us living in Northwestern Ontario, specifically around Melgund Township, Borups Corners, and Dyment, the proposed Deep Geological Repository at the Revell Site is more than just a headline—it is a potential shift in our daily reality. The Nuclear Waste Management Organization (NWMO) has released new documentation outlining how they view the potential effects of this massive project. As your neighbour, I have been reading through the technical language to understand exactly how the federal government plans to measure the changes coming to our backyard.
This isn’t just about rocks and radiation; it is about how our voice fits into a process that is now officially defined as a “federal work.” Let’s break down what the paperwork actually says.
What We Are Learning
The latest documents confirm that the project is moving under federal jurisdiction. The NWMO states that because nuclear facilities fall under the “peace, order and good government” power of Canada, the Impact Assessment will focus heavily on federal laws. They highlight that they have secured “Hosting Agreements” with the Township of Ignace and Wabigoon Lake Ojibway Nation (WLON), marking the site selection as complete.
Essentially, they are promising to follow a “graded approach” to safety—meaning the more risk there is, the more scrutiny they apply. They also plan to report on the social and economic health of our area every three years under the Nuclear Fuel Waste Act.
The Reality Check
While the promises sound organized, we need to look at the evidence provided versus what is actually on the table.
- What is being promised: The NWMO claims they have achieved “social licence” through respectful relationships and agreements with host communities.
- What we need to verify: The Hosting Agreement with WLON remains confidential. Without seeing the non-financial terms, it is difficult for neighbours in Melgund Township to understand what environmental or social safeguards have been promised next door.
- What is being promised: A comprehensive assessment of “non-negligible adverse effects.”
- What we need to verify: The current text defers the actual list of risks to future “preliminary risk screenings.” We are being told the process is safe, but we haven’t yet seen the specific data on what negative effects they have already identified.
The Path Forward
To ensure this project works for us, we need to address the gaps in the current plan with concrete solutions.
The Gap: The report indicates that socio-economic reporting will happen on a “triennial basis” (every three years).
The Solution: Three years is a lifetime in a small community facing rapid construction changes. We are calling for real-time or annual monitoring. If traffic spikes or housing costs soar in Dyment, we cannot wait three years for a report to acknowledge it.
The Gap: The confidentiality of the WLON agreement creates a transparency barrier.
The Solution: We recommend the proponent release a high-level public summary of the environmental and social commitments in that agreement. We don’t need to see the financial figures, but we do need to know what safety standards our neighbours have agreed to.
Why It Matters Here
Why does this paperwork matter to a hunter in Borups Corners or a family in Melgund? Because the definition of “willingness” seems to be treated as a done deal in these documents. However, for us, willingness is an ongoing relationship, not a one-time signature. If the definition of “willingness” isn’t clear, and if the data on risks is deferred until later, our ability to protect our local lifestyle—our quiet nights, our safe roads, and our clean water—is diminished.
Have Your Say
This affects our future. We need to push for transparency on these agreements and faster reporting on social impacts. Submit your feedback on this specific issue via our Engage page to ensure the Impact Assessment Agency hears from our community.
The Melgund Integrated Nuclear Impact Assessment Project
The Impact Assessment Agency of Canada (IAAC) is reviewing the Nuclear Waste Management Organization’s (NWMO) proposed Deep Geological Repository (DGR) at the Revell Site, located near Ignace and Wabigoon Lake Ojibway Nation in Northwestern Ontario.
This major nuclear infrastructure project is undergoing a joint federal review by the IAAC and the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) to evaluate environmental, health, social, and Indigenous rights impacts over its projected 160-year lifecycle.
Public Feedback Open: Comments on the Initial Project Description are accepted until February 4, 2026. Submissions help shape the formal impact assessment guidelines.
This short article and summary is based on an initial analysis of a proponent’s initial project description. It does not represent, any community the NWMO or the Government of Canada. Learn more at the Melgund Integrated Nuclear Impact Assessment Project project page.
About the Author
